Not only are so-called "critics" totally unable to provide a shred of proof to their baseless accusations that I am an "OSA agent" (since this simply isn't true), some also engage in typical hypo-critic double standards.
Below is an example of this. During a thread in which I ask Arnie Lerma to substantiate his baseless allegation that I am an "OSA volunteer", one of his defender jumps in and claims that I am the one who should prove that I don't work for OSA, forgetting that the burden of proof is on those who make the allegation, and not for the accused to prove their innocence. What is more, the "no proof no case" isn't levied against Lerma, as it should since he is the one making the allegation, but only againt me, even though I am the one being accused!!!
| Message-ID: <43r0stk4ptjcc8opt5km78blo4fiiork66@4ax.com> |
| [Bernie:] This is false. I criticize critics all on my very own :-) |
Message-ID: <1002473265.20310.0.nnrp-13.d4e4009b@news.demon.co.uk> |
| [Rev.
Norle Enturbulata:] No proof, no case. Think about it. |
Message-ID: <2v41stgb0pcq6mjo7698citlqdmis32js0@4ax.com> |
| You should ask for proof to Lerma, Rev. He is the one making the allegation. |
Message-ID: <1002491419.3090.0.nnrp-01.d4e4009b@news.demon.co.uk> |
| But I'm asking you, clambot. |
Message-ID: <h9m1stgoo6a0qihktr6d9kq1vv8oodlmne@4ax.com> |
| The burden of proof is on the one making the accusation. |
Message-ID: <1002495154.18131.0.nnrp-02.d4e4009b@news.demon.co.uk> |
| You
should practice what you preach, clamboy! Question avoidance. Flunk! Start again. |
Go to Osa accusations - baseless and false allegations made by so-called "critics" in an attempt to prevent outsiders to check my web site and listen to what I have to say.
Go to Osa accusations against newbies - newbies accused of being "OSA agents" simply for questioning the "wisdom" of critics.
Go to Home
Random Quote :
Disclaimer :
| This web site is NOT created by a Scientologist. It is created by a Scientology EX-MEMBER who is critical of Scientology. However, this ex-member is ALSO critical of the anti-Scientology movement. This does not make him a Scientologist, nor a defender of Scientology. |
